Monday, 24 December 2007

Factoring the Time, 24 hours a day

For the mathematically minded mac users among those reading this may appreciate the following dashboard widget:

XKCD Time Factorisation Widget

I found it funny anyway, although I am now fearing descent into mathematical geekery...

Thursday, 13 December 2007

Making things difficult

I had one of those "what on earth was I thinking?" moments earlier today. It came while standing on the platform of Oxford train station comparing the arrival time at Birmingham International with the departure time of my flight to Belfast. I'm sure I had some logic when I booked the tickets last month, but it turns out that I'd left about 15 mins after I arrived at the airport until check-in closed. And so this would of course be the day for the train to be running 25 mins late...

Thankfully, British European have an online check in, and so was still able to drop my bags off and run to the departure gate to leave me a good ten minutes to spare before the flight took off. So I've indeed made it home, but by a tighter squeeze than I would generally like. It seems I shall have to remember to think the next time I book travel details to ensure I don't arrange any more nightmares. What's that? An eleven hour train journey next time? Darn...

Saturday, 17 November 2007

Back and Forth

The Christmas hols are coming up, which inevitably means that it's about the time that I remember that I probably should have booked my travel back to Belfast much earlier than this. Anyhow, travel has now been sorted, I'm going to head back to Northern Ireland on Thursday 13th December, on what is now my favourite travel route back to Belfast. Someone informed me near the end of my undergraduate degree that there was a direct train from Oxford to Birmingham International that only takes an hour, making it by far an away the quickest connection to an airport from Oxford. Further to this, FlyBE run flights from Birmingham into Belfast City airport, which makes transit from airport to house much easier than flights into Belfast International.

Due to the early start of my course in the new year, as well as a rather significant deadline due at the end of that week, I've decided to return to Oxford on the 29th December. For this journey, I've made the decision to follow through on a thought that I've been harbouring for a while, and I'm going to get the train (and of course a short ferry journey...) back to Oxford. This involves a somewhat epic journey:

Depart Port of Belfast at 0735
Arrive Stranraer Harbour at 0910
Catch train to Carlise at 1000, arriving at 1331
Depart Carlise for Birmingham New Street at 1413, arriving at 1711
Finally, catch train to Oxford from New Street at 1733, estimate time of arrival in Oxford 1841
For those as geeky as I am, there's a map that can be found here.

Total time Belfast to Oxford is 11 hours and 6 minutes. Ouch. But it is all for the rather pleasing price of £30.35, which all in all is quite reasonable. We shall of course see whether I still think it is reasonable at about a quarter to seven on Saturday, 29th December... Although if it is indeed a reasonable experience, the next experiment will be to try the subtly different Belfast-Dublin-Holyhead-Oxford route, so watch this space.

Anyway, there are a couple of questions arising in my head in response to my travels back to Oxford:

1) Is there anyone in Oxford prepared to welcome a weary Irish traveller (in the unorthodox sense) for dinner? I'm suspecting my will to cook will probably be quite low by that point...

2) You may have noted that I'm going to be back before New Year, and it would be nice to see in the new year with some company, so is anyone likely to be in Oxford? Or for that matter somewhere in the South of England?

Answers on a postcard to the usual address...

Wednesday, 17 October 2007

Work, Coffee and Late Nights...

A small amount of thought dedicated to what I miss about Malaysia has lead me to realise that this country lacks one thing that would make my life that little bit easier and possibly more productive: a late opening Starbucks. I will note that the topic may not be of massive surprise to anyone, but I do have a reason for picking up on this one point.

The main problem lies in my decided inability to get any work done in my room, while I much more enjoy grabbing books and a notepad and heading towards a local coffee shop. But there is a problem, I actually need to do much of my work in the evening, as I'm generally quite busy during the day. When I get to the point where I can work, most of the places that I would go to have either converted themselves into cocktail bars for the evening or have simply closed for the evening. This is all rather disappointing.

It's here that my musing of Malaysia comes into the equation, one of the most fantastic features of that country was that everything opened late. 10pm was considered an early closing time, and I'd managed to locate one branch of Starbucks that was open until the early hours. Great news if like me you happen to have a somewhat nocturnal working habit! When you get bored of your surroundings, there were still places to head off and continue to get stuff done.

Alas though, I no longer reside in Kuala Lumpur, and shall have to make the best of my lot. There's always libraries, something that Oxford is in no shortage of, but then you can't really bring coffee in and they definitely don't serve it to you. Alternatively, I reckon I'll take another route. The coffee shops all open in earnest tomorrow morning, I shall be able to wait to re-enter my caffeine induced work surrounding then...

(As a postscript, it should be pointed out that Malaysian shops tend to open late in the morning, around 10am, then stay open until late at night. In short, Malaysia is a country built around evening people - there are a number of ways in which this is my sort of country...)

Sunday, 9 September 2007

The Beginning

Welcome to my new blog! I've decided to move due to the fact that I reckon I've dropped off the blog radar to such a degree that no-one will be regularly checking my old blogs! After returning from a year in Malaysia, things have been fairly busy, and I haven't really had time to keep my online life up to date so much, but here is an attempt to change that. Call it a sort of new academic year resolution, if you will.

I have two other blogs on blogger that I hope to revive over the next few weeks, one with general Christian thoughts (can be found here) and another one that documents my adventures in teacherland (which can be found here), but the aim is to use this blog for more general news and comment. Again, as with all my writing, I can't promise much interesting, but I shall try and keep things up to date.

A quick mention should be made regarding the title of the blog, I'm still claiming that I'm a Belfastman, but the fact is that it's one of the less likely places to find me. Over the last year I've spent most of my time in Kuala Lumpur and next year will be in Oxford, the next year is not looking any more promising for a homecoming. Maybe someday...

Wednesday, 11 April 2007

The importance of "Secondary Issues"

I've not long finished reading Don Carson's book, Exegetical Fallacies, which is an excellent little book despite its tendency to fry your brain at certain points (it's certainly one of those books that I suspect that if I ever get to seminary, I'll get a lot more out of it by reading it again after a couple of years study). Anyway, my reason for writing isn't to offer a book review, but to mention something that struck me in his introduction to the book, which is focused on justifying a study on the mistakes that are often made in biblical interpretation.
"The importance of this study can not be overestimated if we are to move towards unanimity on those matters of interpretation that still divide us. I speak to those with a high view of Scripture: it is very distressing to contemplate how many differences there are among us as to what Scripture actually says. The great, unifying truths should not of course be minimized; but the fact remains that among those who believe the canonical sixty-six books to be nothing less than the Word of God written there is a disturbing array of mutually incompatible theological opinions."
This paragraph makes a point that I'd not really thought about before. In evangelical Christianity we are, rightfully in my opinion, very quick to outline the great Gospel truths that unite all true believers, and to relegate that which divides us, such as the question of when baptism should be administered or the extent of the visible signs of the Holy Spirit, to secondary issues.

There is a problem that can arise from that tactic though. One of the great, uniting truths of Christianity is (or at least should be) the complete authority of Scripture as the written Word of God. A concern that has lurked at the back of my mind when hearing of certain "secondary issues" is whether the difference in interpretation on a matter comes down to a mere giving of lip service to one side's ascent to the authority of Scripture. Could it be that some of the differences that divide Christians could be resolved by humble submission to Scripture?

Of course, it is worth acknowledging that some, and possibly most, differences can be accounted for by a silence of Scripture, but we need to be careful to ensure that we aren't blinding ourselves to a certain interpretation for any reason other than it is not warranted by God's Word, and this may involve many, no doubt including myself, entering into discussion ready and prepared to be proved mistaken, and it could involve an acknowledgement that some "secondary issues" aren't quite as secondary as we first thought.

These are very much preliminary thoughts, rather poorly expressed, so if anyone is reading this, comment would be appreciated, so do let me know what you think.

Tuesday, 10 April 2007

Contemporary Bible Readings? II

Continuing in the slightly frivolous mood of the day, here's another potential contemporary bible reading to add to the one unearthed last year. Today's offering comes from a rendering of 2 Samuel in the ESV.
Nathan said to David, "You are the man!"
2 Samuel 12:7a
You can probably guess from the fact that I'm quoting half a verse that I'm not even claiming this is in context, as any reading of the passage as a whole will show, but it's one of the random things that catches your eye every so often...

John Piper is Bad

I try and keep this 'blog for slightly more considered comment, but occationally there are things I come across which are very much amusing. This one also happens to make a reasonable statement (how's that for an attempt to justify the unjustifiable?).



Do enjoy! And of course if you want to find a less narrow version of John Piper's teaching, that can be found at DesiringGod.org.

Friday, 6 April 2007

Sermon Transcript

While I'm on a short blogging spree, I shall take this time to mention that I was preaching last Sunday on Matthew 17:14-23. Unfortunately, the recording equipment malfunctioned, so there isn't an .mp3 available, but I have produced a transcript which can be downloaded in .pdf form from here. As always, feedback is very much welcome.

I should point out that a major reason my 'blog has been so neglected over the last few weeks has been that our flat's internet service hasn't been working for the last few weeks. Hopefully it will be sorted soon and I can get back to my online life a little more fully!

Saturday, 3 March 2007

The Question of Assurance

Continuing my studies on the Sermon on the Mount (which, as Greg correctly implied, shows that I am using Explore notes at the moment) brought me on to this section in Matthew chapter 7:
"Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. On that day many will say to me, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?' And then will I declare to them, 'I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.'"
Matthew 7:21-23
This is a passage that seems to have caused many people considerable problems. On quite a few occasions since beginning work here, I've been asked questions about how we can be sure of our salvation based on this passage. Based on a first casual viewing, Jesus seems to be saying, "Look at all these people doing great things, and even they are turned away from the Kingdom of Heaven". To an extent, this is indeed what Jesus is saying, but the follow on logic says that, "Well, I don't do half as much as that. Surely I can't be as presumptuous as to say I'm saved". Unsurprisingly, this viewpoint is a particular problem from those who have grown up with a Roman Catholic background.

I think that the answer to this worry comes from understanding the nature of grace. To help illustrate this, I'm going to use a question rather popular with evangelists, because it is a way of figuring out where a person is placing their trust for salvation. I believe it originated with an Australian outreach scheme called Evangelism Explosion, and it has many different forms, the one I use goes something like this:
"If you were to die this minute, and were brought face-to-face with God, and He asks you, "Why should I let you into my heaven?", what would you answer?"
Generally speaking, any answer that begins, "You should let me in because I..." is wrong. There is nothing that we can possibly do that merits our entry into heaven, we are completely dependant on God's grace through Jesus' work for our salvation.
"For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast."
Ephesians 2:8-9

Now what of these criers of "Lord, Lord" in Matthew chapter 7? Well, we can see what their answer is in these verses. On that last day, their appeal to God is on the basis of their mighty works and various acts to merit them with salvation, there is no mention of God's mercy, these people feel as though Heaven is theirs by right because they have done so much for God. Jesus' assessment of these people in verse 23 seems startling, but it is consistent with the teachings of the Old Testament. For example, Isaiah gives this assessment of human "righteousness":
"We have all become like one who is unclean, and all our righteous deeds are like a polluted garment."
Isaiah 64:6a
Even our "good" deeds are like a "polluted garment" (ponder that imagery for a second, it's not pleasant...). How can we ever expect this to be acceptable to God?

In short, the teaching of this short passage is that there is no way to enter the Kingdom of Heaven simply by the basis of our works, even if they are "in Jesus name". Our only option is to fall on the mercy of God, and praise be to Him, mercy shall be provided.
"But now the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law, although the Law and the Prophets bear witness to it-- the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe. For there is no distinction: for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God's righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins. It was to show his righteousness at the present time, so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus."
Romans 3:21-26

Thursday, 1 March 2007

The Importance of a Right Doctrine of Heaven and Hell

From The Biblical Doctrine of Heaven and Hell by Edward Donnelly (published by Banner of Truth Trust):
"Hell is revealed as a place of torment where millions of human beings will be enclosed forever. Statisticians tell us that approximately ninety-five million people die every year. That means that, every second, three human beings enter hell or heaven. Within the next hour, eleven thousand men, woman and children will have gone forever to a place of everlasting joy or a place of everlasting pain. Imagine them dying even now, as you read these words - one, then another, then another. As you draw your next breath, several more are leaving this earth. When a plane crashes and two or three hundred people are suddenly snatched into eternity, everyone talks about it. It is an appalling disaster, headline news. And yet eleven thousand of our fellow human beings, every hour of every day of the year, are reaching their eternal destination. Surely for this reason alone such a doctrine must be an important one."

Saturday, 24 February 2007

How to answer exam questions

Because of the unreliability of the postal service in Malaysia, before posting off our Moore College exams to Sydney, we photocopy the answers so that if they get lost we can produce a copy. This has the side effect of being able to look at the answers of the candidates before we post them off. Occasionally, you learn about the about methods of answering a question when you don't quite know any of the details required to do so.

One the "Introduction to the Bible" scripts shows this art beautifully. In answer to a question asking for an outline of the book of Colossians, the answer given was:
"Paul writes to counter false teaching in the Colossian church, to bring the believers back to the gospel and to teach them how to live among non-believers."
I hope this obtains a high mark, in all seriousness it is a great summary of the form of most of Paul's epistles, the only criticism is it's lack of application to the specific book mentioned in the question. I was very impressed though...

Tuesday, 20 February 2007

Bible Study Resource

Just a quick post to point out something that I've come across since coming out to Malaysia. Point your browser in the direction of bible.org. I've found the site to have some interesting articles and other helpful bits and pieces, and is generally worth a look, but particular mention needs to be given to the NET Bible (short for New English Translation). This is a project to produce a completely free, on-line bible. Now, the reason I'm pointing you towards this isn't because it's a particularly good translation (I haven't found anything wrong with it, but I'm still not seeing a reason to throw away my ESV...), but it includes rather extensive footnotes, often giving translator's notes describing how one phrasing was preferred over another. Definitely worth including as an extra reference during your bible study. And while I'm here, I'll recommend e-Sword again as being an excellent bible study resource, worth downloading if you haven't already.

A final disclaimer is that bible.org is connected with Dallas Theological Seminary, and so a certain amount of dispensationalist theology is to be expected. Please don't let that keep you from checking it out, as most of their stuff is firmly evangelical, but let this be a call to, as the good folks from Moore Theological College would say, "read with discernment".

Thursday, 15 February 2007

Passover, the Last Supper and the Four Cups

This is a little bit of thinking while I write prompted by my revision for my Moore College New Testament 1 exam. Apparently, during the celebration of Passover, every person would be expected to drink four cups of wine. This represents the four "I will" statements that can be found in Exodus 6:6-7.
"Say therefore to the people of Israel, 'I am the LORD, and I will bring you out from under the burdens of the Egyptians, and I will deliver you from slavery to them, and I will redeem you with an outstretched arm and with great acts of judgment. I will take you to be my people, and I will be your God, and you shall know that I am the LORD your God, who has brought you out from under the burdens of the Egyptians."
Exodus 6:6-7
So a cup of wine would have been drunk to remember each of God's promises in these verses - he will bring them out from under their burden, he will deliver them from slavery, he will redeem them and finally he will take them to be his people. These cups would have been drunk at various points during the Passover meal - the first before the Grace before the meal, the second during the meal over which the story of the passover would be told, the third during the Grace after the meal and the last was drunk before the singing of a final hymn at the end of the meal.

A few of the commentaries I've been looking at comment that at the Last Supper, which of course was a Passover meal, Jesus did not drink the last cup, a cup that was sometimes referred to as the "Cup of Consummation". If we were to look at the account of the Last Supper from Mark chapter 14, Jesus says after the distribution of bread and wine:
"Truly, I say to you, I will not drink again of the fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new in the kingdom of God.""
The next thing that happens in v. 26 is they sign a hymn and then go to the Garden of Gethsemane. The commentators argue that Jesus' specific mentioning of not drinking wine again is of cultural significance, saying that the disciples would have realised that he was referring to fulfilling what the final cup was pointing to - God's taking of his people.

I'm not sure I'm convinced, but that's a summary of what little I've looked at. It's certainly an interesting point if it could be shown a little more clearly, and another slight problem is that today, there are actually five cups, not four. The fifth is kept for Elijah, in anticipation of the Messianic age, and isn't drunk, but I'm reckoning that might be a more recent addition...

Friday, 9 February 2007

Being a Peacemaker

In my bible readings at the moment, I'm reading through the Sermon on the Mount. While reading Matthew chapter 5 this morning, I noticed something from the Beatitudes that I can't remember noticing before. Verse 9 tells us:
"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God."

It just caught my attention as to how this is lived out by Jesus, who of course is the Son of God. As Paul says in Colossians 1:19-22:
"For in him all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell, and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether on earth or in heaven, making peace by the blood of his cross. And you, who once were alienated and hostile in mind, doing evil deeds, he has now reconciled in his body of flesh by his death, in order to present you holy and blameless and above reproach before him,"

Christ's mission was one of a peacemaker, it was the Son of God who died to reconcile God with those who were "hostile in mind" towards him by his sacrifice. It's easy to jump from this and say that our application is to be sacrificial as we work towards reconciliation, and that would be a right application, but it is important to also important to keep in mind the means by which reconciliation is achieved. As Paul goes on to say in verse 23:
"if indeed you continue in the faith, stable and steadfast, not shifting from the hope of the gospel that you heard, which has been proclaimed in all creation under heaven, and of which I, Paul, became a minister."

The ultimate reconciliation, that is the one between a sinner and God, comes from a proclamation of the hope of the gospel of Christ. Not quite the peacemaking role we expect at a time when standing for truth is seen as being "unnecessarily divisive", but if we want to be peacemakers, and so be known as sons of God, this is the road we must follow.

Friday, 2 February 2007

The Goal of the Reformation

Firstly, a quick note to point out that I am indeed still alive, although I have been quite busy recently. In general, I try and keep this 'blog for more considered posts, and I simply haven't had time to do that in the last couple of months. As it is, there are a couple of topics that I've come across recently that I want to 'blog about, but it shall have to wait until I can put aside a bit of time to do it.

For the meantime, I shall try to keep this updated a bit more regularly, and put up a few more observations rather expositions, although of course I'll try and put up the more detailed thoughts when I can. This brings me onto my topic for this post. As many of you know, for the last couple of months I've been leading the SMACC Moore College Class for Reformation Church History, which has been a real encouragement. In doing some extra reading for leading the class talking about Cranmer's Liturgical Reformation, I was pointed in the direction of reading the Preface to the 1549 Prayer Book, recorded in the 1662 Book of Common Prayer under the title "Concerning the Service of the Church". If you haven't read it, I suggest that you make amends now - it is a clear expression of the goals of the Reformation. The emphasis is firmly placed on the reading of God's word to enact a change in the hearts of clergy and congregation. Whereas in the past only parts of the bible were read, and when it was it was obscured by a myriad of ritual and superstition, Cranmer's aims were to place at the centre of the church God's word, and every letter of it in a clear and understandable fashion.

Further than that, Cranmer's prayer book sought to simplify the matter of figuring out what needed to be done in the church at any time. The medieval church had developed such an intricate system that figure out what readings were required was almost in itself a full time job, as Cranmer himself puts it:
"...that to turn to the Book only was so hard and intricate matter, that many times there was more business to find out what should be read, than to read it when it was found out."
Cranmer's solution was to cut through confusion by reducing the number of services authorised by the church, and to reducing the various orders to a single book, so that Church of England services could always be conducted solely using a Bible and a the Book of Common Prayer. But lest we concentrate on the means to which it was achieved, let us admire the goal that led to those means - to remove all barriers to the clear proclamation of the gospel.

It was this period that saw a most dramatic turn to true religion that has been seen in Europe, and study of the Reformation shows that the main cause of this change was a disclosure of the gospel from the chains of superstition. It's strange to see so many modern churches screaming out for revival neglect the cause of that of that great revival, choosing to seek it rather in some ritual or the other rather than true devotion to God's self-revelation in His word the Bible.